Jump to Navigation

Dallas Employment Law Blog

Proposed whistleblower law could protect federal employees

Dallas, Texas, is home to a large population of federal employees. While the majority of government operations run lawfully, it is not unheard of that a federal agency engages in wrongdoing. When federal employees learn of government abuses, most feel obligated to report the relevant information to the proper authorities. However, many would-be whistleblowers may not disclose what they know for fear of disciplinary action or dismissal.

To aid these workers, the U.S. Senate recently approved legislation known as the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act. This anticipated law would promote employee rights by protecting federal workers from retaliation if they disclose improprieties in government functions. The idea behind the proposed law is not new. For 12 years, the Senate has been passing similar legislation, only to have it fail at the House of Representatives or presidential level.

EEOC changes offer more protection to former criminals

Job seekers in Dallas, Texas, and throughout the country may face difficulty finding employment if they have criminal convictions in their past. Luckily, the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recently updated its guidelines on the practice of criminal background checks by employers. The EEOC was concerned that these checks lead to employment discrimination against minority individuals who have higher rates of criminal convictions than whites.

The EEOC's new policy suggests that employers give job applicants the opportunity to explain past criminal arrests or convictions that come up in background checks. The EEOC also urges employers not to inquire about an applicant's previous convictions on job applications, especially when a person's criminal history has nothing to do with the job he or she hopes to get.

Dallas Men Accuse IHOP of Employment Discrimination

A group of Dallas, Texas, area men recently filed a workplace discrimination lawsuit, claiming they were fired from the IHOP restaurant chain because of their Muslim beliefs and Arab backgrounds. In the lawsuit the men stated that over a period of several years, IHOP owners directed a number of discriminatory comments toward them that belittled their religious beliefs and national origins, despite the men's' status as American citizens. The men allege they were fired from their jobs because the IHOP owners wanted non-Arab workers, even though all four men had records of positive performance evaluations.

The employment discrimination case was reviewed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission which found "reasonable cause" that the workers had been harassed and fired based on their religious and ethnic backgrounds. The EEOC is a federal agency that enforces federally mandated standards of employment practices. Federal law prohibits employers from discriminating against or harassing employees on the basis of their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability or genetic information.

Another case of workplace discrimination involving Facebook

A former federal employee of the Library of Congress is pursuing a workplace discrimination complaint against his former employer, based on religious and sexual orientation harassment.

The employee, a 30-year-old male, traces the root of the harassment back to his "Like" on a Facebook page that promoted homosexual adoption. The employee was also Facebook friends with his supervisor's daughter, who commented negatively about his "Like" of that particular website. The employee alleged that his supervisor's daughter almost immediately "unfriended" him on Facebook, and he was treated differently at work from that day forward.

Disabled man files discrimination lawsuit against Wendy's

With the economy and jobs at a premium these days, it is definitely an employer's market for job seekers. Unemployment remains high in many areas and the jobs that are available are highly competitive, even in the fast food industry. This week a suit was filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against a Wendy's franchisee in Killeen, Texas.

The suit was filed by a hearing impaired man who felt that he was denied employment because of his disability. In court documents, the suit alleges that the man had previous experience from a different fast food establishment and had successfully interviewed with a Wendy's shift manager.

Texas firefighters disputing change in overtime rules

Contract disputes can be complicated. The city of Fort Worth, Texas, made a policy change to overtime rules that directly affect firefighters and now, the Fort Worth Professional Firefighters Association is suing the city saying that the city made this change without notifying the firefighters association.

The city made the policy change in January 2009 which took away paid time-and-a-half for a firefighter. Before the change, a firefighter could take time off of for sick or vacation leave during the week and still get paid for it. It was a benefit that was more generous than the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards. The association's dispute is that this policy change took place in January 2009, but their new collective bargaining agreement wasn't reached until 2010. The firefighters believe that the city should have bargained in good faith.

Counter suit filed in wrongful termination case

A wrongful termination suit can be controversial and in the case of a woman who alleges she was wrongfully terminated, is now facing a counterclaim on her suit from the daycare where she previously worked.

Kiddie Korner Day Care in Texas is filing their counterclaim because they feel the former employee is making false accusations against their company and is slandering the business. The original wrongful termination suit began last year when an employee of the daycare reported a possible case of child abuse or neglect with the Jefferson County Sheriff's Department.

City settles federal discrimination, wrongful termination claim

The city of Kalamazoo, Michigan, recently settled a federal discrimination lawsuit filed by an employee of the city's public safety department. The employee claimed that because of his obsessive-compulsive disorder he was treated differently than other employees and was wrongfully terminated because of his disorder.

The city agreed to grant him a duty disability retirement for which he will collect a pension in the amount of a little over $4,000 per month. The city's attorney also said it would pay him for vacation and sick time he accrued and settled a worker's compensation claim he had previously filed with the city. The city will also pay his attorney fees and remove any records of disciplinary actions documented in his personnel file related to the discrimination complaint.

Unemployed feel bias when applying for jobs

If you are one of the unfortunate workers that were laid off during this recession and still haven't landed a full-time job in your field, you aren't alone. In many states unemployed workers are being discriminated against because they don't have a job and are realizing that you need a job in order to get a new job.

Workers across the United States have shared their experiences about being written off by a prospective employer if they have been out of work for six months or more and in some states, job ads have clearly stated that a candidate must be currently employed. Many states are taking a stand against this bias by considering legislation to prevent employers from discriminating against the unemployed.

Your online presence could help or hinder your career

For many Americans, the advent of social media, texting, twittering, is too much to keep up with. But, if you are looking for a job or working at a company, it might be to your advantage to be aware of the potential pitfalls of using social media so that you don't get fired from your job, or overlooked for a position because of your postings.

According to Mindflash.com, 45 percent of employers use social media sites like Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter to screen potential employees. Employers aren't looking for negative information, but in some cases looking at these sites gives them a good idea about the type of person that may be joining their company. In fact, 18 percent of employers found content on these sites that influenced them to go ahead and hire a candidate.

Subscribe to This Blog's Feed
Send us an email

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
FindLaw Network