"Serving those who serve in government"
Call now for a free consultation 888-351-0424

Who really believes this to be a good idea?

Politicians, especially those who know they have no chance of winning their party's nomination, may say things and make proposals that are unlikely to become real. In today's news, a former chief executive of Hewlett-Packard, Carly Fiorina, announced a bid for the Republican Party's presidential nomination.

One proposal was truly notable. The NY Times reports she feels the "federal work force is too large and says she would cut the pay of federal workers and base their compensation on performance." Really? The statement is remarkable in many ways. 

Given the varied nature of federal employment, it is a wonder how she came to this determination. Federal jobs include forecasters with the National Weather Service, federal judges, engineers with the Federal Highway Administration, Nurses and Doctors at Veterans' Affairs hospitals, criminal prosecutors with the Justice Department, epidemiologists with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, air traffic controllers with the Federal Aviation Administration and park rangers in the National Parks.

In virtually all of these areas, the issue is more frequently a lack of sufficient staffing. From where exactly would all of these cuts she suggests come?

That she also suggests that all pay should be cut and compensation based on performance appears to indicate a lack of understanding of the civil service system and the merit system principles.

One of the statutory merit system principles notes, "Employees should be retained on the basis of adequacy of their performance." Perhaps as a former CEO she has a different conception of performance than the one found in the dictionary?

The problems faced by the civil service system and managing the federal workforce are the same as any in a large and varied bureaucracy that has tens of thousands of employees and that involves the expenditure of billions of dollars.

Foolish statements that have little basis in reality, such as unilateral pay cuts or ending of due process rights for federal workers will not improve the quality, effectiveness or morale of the federal workforce. It does call her judgment into question.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
American Bar Association Logo Best Attorneys Online Logo Elite Lawyers 2017 Logo Lead Counsel Rated Logo The New York Times Logo Avvo Rating 9.7 Logo State Bar of Texas Logo

We Understand That Your Federal Career Is On The Line
We offer a free consultation, and our fee structures are designed to meet your needs.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.

Back To Top